Chelsea - Stamford Bridge

Chelsea - Stamford Bridge

Sunday, May 18, 2014

#UOSM2008 Digital Portfolio - Summary

Before UOSM2008 I was already using social media. However, as it turned out, this use had little or no benefit to my future career. I’ve never blogged, had only ~10 tweets, my Facebook profile was for social life only and the LinkedIn was far from perfect. Below are given the online changes of my attitude and presentation divided into main topics.

Twitter (https://twitter.com/Eldar994)


During the module time, I’ve realized the true power of Twitter and started to target three categories of twitter accounts (Fig.1):
  • The module classmates/lecturers, for communication.
  • The companies I support and keep up-to-date with, and more specifically, CEOs of the companies, e.g. Microsoft, Apple, Intel, IBM, etc.
  • Job recruitment agencies, e.g. GraduateJobFeed.co.uk, ProspectsJobs, TargetJobs, etc.

Figure.1

I’ve published ~170 module related tweets (~1-2/day). Now I use the Twitter to share my posts and my LinkedIn updates. My about.me page is connected to Tweeter as well (Fig.2).


Figure.2

LinkedIn (uk.linkedin.com/pub/eldar-alasgarov/67/621/636/)


My LinkedIn profile had most changes as my online appearance. Firstly, I’ve customizing my Profile:  changed the picture, added my Twitter and Blog for communication (Fig.3).


Figure.3

Previously, I was targeting my friends. However, thanks to UOSM2008 I’ve started to target management structures of the companies I’m interested in and/or I‘ve applied for. In three months I’ve connected to more than 370 people, mostly IT professionals, Recruiters, and HRs of the world leading companies, e.g. IBM, Deloitte, Facebook, Siemens, etc. (Fig.4)
                                                                         
                                                                         

Figure.4

I’ve joined groups, both job search and IT related, in order to be up-to-date (Fig.5), and encouraged my friends to write recommendations (Fig.6).


Figure.5

Figure.6

After the upgrades, just in one week my profile was viewed by 50 people and I’ve shown up 32 times in search results in past 90 days (Fig.7).

Figure.7

Blogger


During blogging topics were discussed with the classmates via sharing and commenting on in each other’s posts. I’ve seen different styles of writing and presenting, different approaches and opinions on each topic. Based on classmates’ feedbacks, we were able to adjust and reconsider our opinion in the topics’ summary.


Figure.8

Both with posts and comments, I’ve written 11,041 words. For a non-native speaker, this is nothing but a good practice.


About.me (http://about.me/eldar.alasgarov/)


I’ve never used About.me and was quite surprised with the power and simplicity of it. It gathers all social networks known nowadays into one single page, which you can customize and add a summary. Previously, when exchanging contacts, I’d have to give separately the email/Facebook/Twitter/LinkedIn profiles. However, now I pass to people my About.me page which contains all information about me online. After improvements suggested by the classmates, Kim Fenton and Francesca Gerard (Fig.9), I’ve started to get hundreds of views on my profile every week! (Fig.10)


Figure.9


Figure.10

Topics


What about the topics covered in the module? Were they useful? Definitely, Yes! And here is a small list of the lessons learned (Fig.11):
  1. Categorization of people into “Digital Residents” and “Visitors” isn’t perfect. There are people who don’t fall under these categories.
  2. The amount of online identities you have doesn’t matter, what matters is how you manage them.
  3. Tips to build/improve your online identity.
  4. We are responsible for the actions performed online as much as in real live.
  5. People do have right to “Open Access”.





Figure.11

Future plans


As currently I haven’t decided on the market I want to focus on, UK or Azerbaijan, I’m currently targeting both and trying to expand my network as much as possible. Once decided, I will use all social media available to be in advantage against other applicants even before we meet our potential employer.

Word Count: 599



Sunday, May 11, 2014

#UOSM2008 Reflective Summary: Topic 5




Picture source: http://library.uncc.edu/openaccess 

So, it is time for a summary and will be honest, this time I was quite hesitating on my decision. I haven’t even provided a small summary at the end of my main post this week, as I usually do. However, thanks for my classmates’ comments, blog posts I have read, and the additional articles researched during the second week, I have come to the point where I support the idea of Open Access (OA) and here are some notes in support of my opinion, both provided for personal research and classmates’:
  • As a student, not using such a great amount of knowledge available with one mouse click is just isn’t right, especially when we pay for it. As Jazzmin Curzon has mentioned, it will “add significant value to the educational process”.
  • As was mentioned both by me and Laura Higgins, most of the scientific and medical research is paid by public funds, so shouldn’t tax payers see the results of these researches?
  • For an author, reusing of the articles and jounalsincreases the popularity of that work and subsequently you recieve more citations (Evie Bool).
  • Scale, Cost and Speed. I decided to merge this three performance factors nicely provided by Francesca Gerard, as you can reach a great number of readers in little or no cost and at a speed that allows your current Internet.

And to summarize, there is one word left to be said. I’m not saying that the articles and journals should be completely FREE. Obviously there is some kind of payment that supports the day-to-day functionality of the journals itself, and ‘yes’, there are a few disadvantages of the open source, such as not centralized system of storage for articles or lack of trust to a specific source because of its variety online. HOWEVER, aren’t we, either students or ordinary people, those who pay for this kind of researches, either via our tuition fees or taxes? Aren’t we those for whom these researches are performed? And isn’t these researches targeting the goal to make human life easier to some extend? If the answer for these questions are “Yes”, then I Do believe that we have right to access the knowledge broadly available nowadays.


“Why can’t we do it in a way where the knowledge is distributed broadly and not restricted” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=L5rVH1KGBCY)



Sunday, May 4, 2014

#UOSM2008 Topic 5: Advantages and Disadvantages of Open Access to Online Materials

Note: This post covers only the research archives as an example of content provider (because of the word limit). However, most of the pros and cons mentioned can be applied to other media types as well.
We, students and academics, all had that moment when you search in Google on a specific topic, and the search engine returns you an article with quite an interesting abstract, and you think that:” Here is the one!!”. However, when you press the link it requires you to sign up and perform an online payment, and all your plans for going sleep earlier tonight just ruin and you need to start the search over again (as happened during my search for the current topic, see Picture 1). The dilemma of whether to make the access to online materials open or closed nowadays have become a significant issue, which increases as the Internet expands. According to the study by Simon-Kucher & Partners, 90% of online content will be held behind paywalls (Lepitak, 2013), and subsequently a question arises whether should the content producers make their content freely available? Below I will provide both advantages and disadvantage of the given issue:
Picture 1.
Note: “Open Access” (OA) is a term referred to articles without any restrictions posed by subscriptions (Bo-Christer et al., 2010).
Advantages:
  • First and most important one, open access definitely will lower the transaction costs throughout the process (both publishers, libraries and readers) (Bo-Christer, 2004).
  • Availability of articles everywhere and to everyone, just have the Internet connection (Judy et al., 2003).
  • Authors, who are happy with open access for their articles get benefits, such as wider dissemination, higher citation, etc. (C. Prosser, 2003).
  • This can encourage people for independent learning/researching (Judy et al., 2003).
  • Last but not least, OA can increase “cross-discipline fertilization” of an article (Eysenbach, 2006), which basically refers to the citations of articles to each-other, but not just in the same disciple that they are.

Disadvantages:
  • Open Access journals are rarely indexed in in commercial indexing services, which universities provide for searching quality-assured publications (Bo-Christer, 2004).
  • A journal becomes split in different conditions, in different access point, which makes life a bit harder (C. Prosser, 2003).
  • Access to required hardware (Judy et al., 2003). Let’s be honest, not everyone nowadays has a laptop, PC or printers, and what is more important, reading-friendly devices, such as tablets and readers.
  • Both libraries and authors will get an initial shortfall of revenue, as the number of subscribers will drop dramatically (C. Prosser, 2003).
  • Information can vary in sources, as there is no centralised repository (Judy et al., 2003). Nowadays there are hundreds of websites that provide access to online articles and journals, such as ACM and IEEE libraries.

Believe me, I could continue the list if I had enough word count (please follow the links in “References”).

What do I personally think? Obviously as a student I support the idea of the Open Access for everyone and everywhere, as the world of education can’t improve without open access resources. On the other hand, however, as a person I strongly believe that academics and researchers do have their rights to put a price on their works, especially for those which took them a lot of time to create. Because of this dilemma I have faced with I will not give a small conclusion for the current post (as I usually do), as I have some doubts in myself.  I hope my classmates’ posts and comments will clarify my opinion till the “Reflection Summary” post.


Apologies for a bit longer post this time. Just wanted to make it special.

References

  • Bo-Christer, B., 2004. Open access to scientific publications - an analysis of the barriers to change? IR Information Research, 9(2), pp.170-91.
  • Bo-Christer, B. et al., 2010. Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE , 5(6), pp.1-9.
  • C. Prosser, D., 2003. From here to there: a proposed mechanism for transforming journals from closed to open access. Learned Publishing, 16(3), pp.163-66.
  • Eysenbach, G., 2006. The Open Access Advantages. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(2).
  • Judy, M., Carol, J. & Peter, C., 2003. Web based learning. ABC of learning and teaching, 326(7394), pp.870-73. 
  • Lepitak, S., 2013. 90% of online content to be held behind paywalls in three years media company survey suggests. [Online] Available at: http://www.thedrum.com/news/2013/04/12/90-online-content-be-held-behind-paywalls-three-years-media-company-survey-suggests [Accessed 3 March 2014].